| 235 | 6 | 69 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
研究不同机组负荷、还原剂制备方式下超低排放燃煤机组SO3和NH3生成及迁移规律,结果表明:负荷的升高促进SCR(选择性催化还原)系统内SO2转化为SO3,也会促进氨逃逸上升;机组负荷的升高抑制SO3和NH3在空预器段迁移;3种还原剂制备方式的机组,SO3迁移比例在空预器为1.5%~10.4%,在LLT-ESP(低低温电除尘器)为33.7%~53.9%,在FGD(脱硫塔)为17.0%~29.3%; NH3在空预器和LLT-ESP的迁移比例分别为23%~50%和50%~67%,进入FGD量极少;还原剂制备方式短时对NH3和SO3生成及迁移影响不明显,长期运行可能造成氨逃逸上升,进而影响SO3迁移。
Abstract:In this paper, the formation and migration characteristics of SO3 and NH3 in ultra-low emission coal-fired units under different unit loads and reductant preparation methods are studied. The results show that load increase accelerates the conversion of SO2 to SO3 in a selective catalytic reduction(SCR) system, and also increases the escaped ammonia. The increase of unit load inhibits the migration of SO3 and NH3 in the air preheater. The migration ratios of SO3 in air pre-heater, LLT-ESP(low-low temperature electrostatic precipitator), and FGD(flue gas desulfurization) of different reductant preparation methods units are respectively 1.5%~10.4%, 33.7%~53.9%, and 17.0%~29.3% of the total SO3. The migration ratios of NH3 in air pre-heater and LLT-ESP of different reducing agent preparation methods units are 23% ~50% and 50% ~67% respectively with a small amount of NH3 entering FGD. The preparation method of the reductant has no obvious impact on the generation and migration of NH3 and SO3 in a short time, but its long-term operation may cause ammonia escape increase, which in turn affects the SO3 migration.
[1]王妍艳,陶雷行,岳春妹,等.超低排放燃煤机组SO3脱除效果研究[J].电力与能源,2020,41(5):93-98.
[2]袁细宁.脱硝市场现状及发展建议[J].科技资讯,2010(19):222.
[3]胡劲逸.基于氨逃逸浓度场的SCR喷氨协调优化控制[D].杭州:浙江大学,2015.
[4]MATSUDA S,KAMO T,KATO A,et al.Deposition of ammonium bisulfate in the selective catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides with ammonia[J].Industrial&Engineering Chemistry Product Research and Development,1982,21(1):1888-1900.
[5]朱崇兵,金保升,李锋,等.SO2氧化对SCR法烟气脱硝的影响[J].锅炉技术,2008(3):68-72.
[6]王杭州.SCR对脱硝效率及SO2转化影响分析[J].电力科学与工程,2009,24(5):17-21.
[7]冯前伟,张杨,王丰吉,等.燃煤机组SCR脱硝超低排放改造前后性能对比分析[J].中国电机工程学报,2020,40(20):258-267.
[8]柴小康,黄国和,解玉磊,等.某燃煤超低排放机组非常规污染物脱除[J].环境工程学报,2020,14(12):242-256.
[9]张杨.燃煤电厂环保装备对SO3排放的影响及控制策略研究[D].杭州:浙江大学,2020.
[10]BURKE J M,JOHNSON K L.Ammonium sulfate and bisulfate formation in air preheaters[J].Bmj british medi cal journal,1982,329(7463):446.
[11]杨建国,杨炜樱,郑方栋,等.NH3和SO3对硫酸氢铵和硫酸铵生成的影响[J].燃料化学学报,2018,46(1):92-98.
[12]YU W C,WU X,SI Z,et al. Influences of impregnation procedure on the SCR activity and alkali resistance of V2O5-WO3/TiO2catalyst[J].Applied Surface Science,2013,283:209-214.
[13]刘亚明,束航,徐齐胜,等.SCR脱硝过程中SO2催化氧化的原位红外研究[J].燃料化学学报,2015(8):1018-1024.
[14]JI P D,GAO X,DU X S,et al.Relationship between the molecular structure of V2O5/TiO2catalysts and the reactivity of SO2oxidation[J].Catalysis Science&Technology,2016,6(4):1187-1194.
[15]马双忱,邓悦,吴文龙,等.SCR脱硝过程中硫酸氢铵形成特性实验研究[J].动力工程学报,2016,36(2):143-150.
[16]谢增孝,王民军,朱继峰.尿素水解法在超超临界机组脱硝系统中的应用与优化[J].浙江电力,2020,39(3):88-93.
基本信息:
DOI:10.19585/j.zjdl.202108014
中图分类号:X773
引用信息:
[1]李文华,吴贤豪,陈彪,等.超低排放燃煤机组SO_3和NH_3生成及迁移规律研究[J],2021,40(08):91-95.DOI:10.19585/j.zjdl.202108014.
基金信息:
浙江省能源集团2019年科技项目(ZNKJ-2019-032)